Search Site
226 Lenox Ave. | New York, New York 10027
Free Consultation 212-406-9466
Gilberto Valle: NYPD Cannibal Cop On Trial


 Gilberto Valle – Meals we only Dream of and Meals that we go and Prepare

From my perspective, it is interesting that the NYC Police Officer on trial for conspiring to kidnap, torture and eat women, somehow was able to become a police officer.   How does NYPD screen recruits?

What is generally interesting about this case is the prosecution’s evidence or lack thereof.  The defense team certainly made the right decision in deciding not to put their sick but legally sane client, NYC Police Officer Gilberto Valle, on the stand.  Any amount of cross examination regarding the images and videos found on his computer along with his twisted plots to kidnap, torture and cannibalize his female victims would be too much.  How can anyone explain a desire to torture, kill and consume women?  How does someone develop that type of perversion?  How is it that a police officer is emailing other cannibals about killing and eating innocent people?   For the defense to expose their client to cross examination and the demand for answers to those questions would have been dicey.  There is no way to explain away sauteed Susan or fried Francesca.  The defense’s best strategy is to suggest that there is insufficient evidence to prove that their client was serious about his admittedly sick fantasies.

Police Officer Valle should go to jail for using a computer database restricted for the use of law enforcement personnel to obtain information about his supposed targets.   But the jury will also have to decide whether his accessing that database to find alleged potential victims constituted a concrete step (“overt act”) toward carrying out the planned crimes or whether he was just engaging in a sick fantasy.

18 U.S.C. 371 defines conspiracy under federal law.  Different states have different conspiracy provisions, but they all share similarities and are distinguished from criminal facilitation and solicitation.   According to 18 U.S.C. 371, conspiracy is a crime separate from an underlying substantive crime.  It is unlawful for a person to conspire or agree with another person to do something which, if actually carried out, would constitute another  federal crime.  A conspiracy is an agreement to engage in a criminal act, followed by at least one overt act toward the completion of the planned crime.   The prosecutors do not have to prove that the cop actually succeeded in slicing, dicing and consuming anyone in order to prove conspiracy, but they do have to prove an overt act.    The statute defines an overt act as any transaction or event, even one which may be innocent in-and-of-itself, but which is knowingly committed by a conspirator in an effort to accomplish some aspect of the conspiracy.

What does all that mean?

The Valle jury will have to be convinced (beyond a reasonable doubt) that:

1.       The police officer had an agreement or understanding with another sick, perverted freak to kidnap, torture and/or eat another person, or some other criminal act;

2.       Valle willfully became a member of that conspiracy;

3.       Either Valle or one of the other people he had the understanding or agreement with knowingly committed at least one overt act; and

4.        The overt act was knowingly committed roughly contemporaneously in an effort to accomplish some object of the conspiracy.

While the defense made the right decision not to put their client on the stand, it may have been wiser to call an expert to discuss the cop’s fascination with violence toward women, including cannibalism, and to explain how that perversion could remain in Valle’s sick fantasy world.  That expert could have aptly described the distinction between fantasy and reality and supported the defense argument that Valle did not really intend to act on his perverted cannibalistic plans, that there really wasn’t any real agreement to actually perform the crimes, it was just a form of mental masturbation.

The prosecutors are going to capitalize on how sick and disgusting the cop’s interests are and try to convince the jury that Valle was intending to commit the crimes.  The defense will argue that if Valle was really thinking about carrying out his gruesome scheme, there would have been at least a few leftovers in his refrigerator, a kidney stew,  thigh meat, something to show this guy was serious.  The fact is that the line between fantasy and reality is often very blurry and it was blurred for this police officer.   Fantasy is only exciting if there is the real possibility of fulfillment.    Officer Valle, at minimum, considered the possibility and desired that fulfillment of that possibility.    How far was he going to go?  Officer Valle himself probably couldn’t tell you for sure.  How did the NYC Police Department make this guy a cop?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact us

Please fill out the form below and one of our attorneys will contact you.

Quick Contact Form

Our Office
  • New York Office
    226 Lenox Ave.
    New York, New York 10027
    Phone: 212-406-9466
    Fax: 212-406 9410
  • "Lenox Avenue attorney Carmen Giordano is honest, experienced and determined to win. He and his staff consistently provide incredible customer service and a solid commitment to serving the Harlem community."  -Daniel “Dapper Dan” Day

  • "I initially hired Carmen S. Giordano in 2005 to represent Be & D, our high-end ladies accessories division, in litigation with one of our major suppliers. Mr. Giordano quickly and efficiently collected pertinent information and was able to obtain a judgment that I considered most satisfactory. I have continued to ask Mr. Giordano to represent us in domestic and some international matters. I know that I can rely on his legal advice, and I deeply appreciate his personal warmth and genuineness whenever I contact him."  -Larry Dumain

  • "Recommend Carmen Giordano?” You cannot “recommend ” a friend, you have to experience the warmth the caring, the true concern to help you with your problem . It’s an “experience ” to to hear the sound advice and how to proceed with a dilemma. Yes, Carmen is a true “trailblazer”, a “template ” for other attorneys, in his total concern for his client/friend and how to help. He is also very well supported by his staff."  -Peter Grinenko

  • "Carmen is an OUTSTANDING Lawyer. This guy really gets things done! I never met a lawyer who put in so much effort and hardwork into their cases . I met Carmen about a month ago where i had a real messy case and a month later my case was settled. I recommend him as a lawyer 100%. This guy is the real deal!"  -Mancita

  • "I have been very happy with the work Carmen has led on my behalf. He is responsive and completely reliable and trustworthy. I know I can always depend on him to make sound recommendations on my behalf. He knows the law from A to Z and stays current on changes in the law whether it’s estate planning, employment issues or legal matters for same-sex couples. He has as comfortable style which helps clients be at ease and he always takes the time to explain concepts and implications so we can arrive at informed decisions together."  -Jack T

  • "Carmen helped me fight a case against a crooked Psychiatrist named forester. We settled the case and therefore won. With the win and the money, I was able to rebuild my life to some degree. Lawyers don’t get much better than this guy. Thank You again Carmen!"  -Jon

  • "Mr. Giordano is honest, trustworthy, efficient, thorough & caring. He is professional & personable. He truly cares about his clients. I highly recommend him."  -Kim

  • "Carmen Giordano is the embodiment of everything you would hope to find in a lawyer; he is trustworthy, sincere and knows his stuff. He comes highly recommended from such a vast cross-section of people–from mutual friends at the National Action Network, to clothing designers and music producers. Having experience in such a variety of areas makes Giordano one of the most well rounded attorneys I know. I wholeheartedly recommend him because unlike some in his industry, he really looks out for you. And from the times I have been in his office, he truly represents everyone from the falsely accused in Harlem, with nowhere to turn, to big shots, including top musicians and an occasional judge."  -Michelle

  • "I highly endorse this lawyer. He has great integrity and very broad experience in litigation. He has had great success in achieving excellent results for his clients; provides vigorous and reliable representation to each client; and has excellent judgment in assessing the merits of a claim."  -Margaret King, Attorney

  • "Carmen Giordano came to my rescue when I needed it most. I was a passenger in a taxi that crashed, leaving me badly injured and unable to work or take care of my 3 children. The taxi company tried to downplay my injuries and my losses. But Carmen fought for me every step of the way in this complicated case. He understood my lost wages, and understood the strain on my family (he’s a father too). He made sure the judge understood it, too. By the the time he concluded his eloquent opening argument, the defendants quickly settled. I remain extremely grateful to Mr. Giordano."  -Lauren

Leave a Review